Category: xkcd

Fun with Wikipedia Networks

Kyle 1 Comment

So the mouse-over text of today’s xkcd (“Wikipedia trivia: if you take any article, click on the first link in the article text not in parentheses or italics, and then repeat, you will eventually end up at ‘Philosophy.'”) has inspired a little playful procrastination. I’d love to put together one of those fun xkcd-style info graphics (the ones with results of interesting little Internet experiments, e.g. “Numbers,” “Regrets,” “Dangers,” etc.) with the results of some collective poking around. Data so far (from myself, Katy “Southside” Huff, Matt Waldron, and Eric “Wolfman” Howell):

“xkcd”: 19 clicks
“Kadevu”: 21 clicks
“Walker Percy”: 27 clicks
“Kevin Bacon”: 13 clicks
“Wisconsin Badgers”: 27 clicks

Also, can someone who knows more about graph theory than I do give us some vocabulary to flesh out the kinds of data we can gather (or wish we could gather)? For instance, Matt Waldron asks via Twitter “I wonder what the longest non-loop answer is (i.e. was the furthest ‘point’ from Philosophy)?” His point about loops (graph theory: “cycles”) is an interesting one. Has anyone found a cycle yet? I thought I had one in the Percy chain, but it turns out there are separate articles for “Meaning (philosophy of language)” and “Meaning (linguistic).” (This is one of those moments where I wish I were a better programmer and could just start writing code to explore all these questions. I’d also need to not be on the clock with someone else’s money, which may actually be all that is stopping me.)

Anyway, if you’re looking for a few minutes off from whatever you doing (I myself am determined to finish my Walker Percy paper for the upcoming Christian Scholars Conference), please consider checking out a few articles’ paths to “Philosophy” and report back!

Doctorow Did It!

Kyle

As I was catching up on my usual Web comics this morning (which were really on fire this week–see links in sidebar at right), I was especially amused by a thought that occurred to me when reading Wednesday’s xkcd. If you’ve seen Cory Doctorow’s excellent essay “Wikipedia: A Genuine H2G2—Minus the Editors” in the mostly disappointing The Anthology at the End of the Universe, you realize this comic’s basically already been written. Have you seen that “Simpsons did it” episode of South Park? I couldn’t help wondering if Randall Monroe has similar visions of Doctorow always one step ahead of him. Then again, in the case of those two, the idea-borrowing goes both ways.

Anyway, great comic anyway, as usual. Image courtesy xkcd.com and used by permission:

P.S.: I hate to badmouth anything DNA-related, but, seriously, The Anthology at the End of the Universe pretty much sucks. The notable exceptions are the Doctorow piece and the brilliant and hilarious “The Secret Symbiosis: The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy and Its Impact on Real Computer Science” by Bruce Bethke. I work with these people–it’s all true.

P.P.S.: I’m sure other people have pointed this out on the xkcd forums, but in my opinion the scraped away Kindle logo should have yielded “Don’t Panic.” It’s an inside joke anyway–why not get it right?

Missing, Presumed Fed

Kyle 1 Comment

It may appear that I’ve pulled a succession of Lig Lury, Jr.’s these last two weeks’ worth of evenings. However, this editor hasn’t been out grabbing food every night. I’ve actually just been trying to recover and catch up a bit from the semester, to get moving on summer research, and to take care of some business I’ve been putting off for a long time. More to come on that final front soon, I expect.

In other news…

This editor, I just discovered, is awesome. You should read his blog, especially in light of the sad track record of Sunday Judgment recently. All the magnificently nerdy copy-editor talk notwithstanding (my favorite line, regarding Myanmar v. Burma: “In any event, the State Department does not hold sway over our house style.”), perhaps the most compelling reason to check out McIntyre’s blog is here.

And this is so cool I won’t even bother with an introduction, though I’ll mention that I was sad it didn’t get mentioned here. Friends of mine and I have been talking about taking a “spontaneously generated adventure” one of these days; let me know if you want to join in.

Sunday Judgment V

Kyle 1 Comment

I don’t have much ire left after two straight grumpy posts, so I thought in this installment we could just all meditate on an increasingly divisive issue: “‘They’ as a third-person singular gender-free pronoun.” It sounds as if Randall Munroe is “all for it,” as is my friend Scott, a Ph.D. candidate in psychology who studies developmental linguistics. I don’t think it will ever sound right to my ear though, so I guess I’m doomed to further hours of toil figuring out ways to avoid “he or she” without being sexist or unnecessarily pluralizing the whole sentence. If you’re able to embrace the singular they, though, more power to you.

Speaking of xkcd and language, I highly recommend LimerickDB.com, which Munroe created and which has some hilarious stuff in the Top 150. (I should probably warn you that some of the content there is sexual–though also textual.)

I also recommend this delightful little riff on semicolons from the New York Times. I missed it originally; thank goodness my friend Liz sent it along. I especially like the little celebrity interviews. It is hilarious, though, that they mispunctuated the title of Lynn Truss’s book (see the correction). I guess they’ve never heard the joke.

(N.B.: The they in each of the two proceeding sentences is meant to refer to the author and various editors of the piece collectively and is not an attempt at singular they usage in response to the gender-ambiguity of the author’s name. Just to be clear.)