Zoe and Yesenia embrace after hiking

Sitting around the fire with Team Z

You wouldn’t think it would be that interesting to listen to people making a video over Zoom.

Regular readers/listeners and people who have spent time with me will probably chuckle knowingly when I say that I don’t like making unqualified statements, especially about my own work. But I remember very clearly during my defense saying to the committee something like “Say what you will about Chapter 4it isn’t boring.”

What’s more, I knew it wouldn’t be boring, even before we had finished holding the sessions during which Team Z created their digital story. Because it’s effectively a highlight reel of the “story circle,” the most fascinating aspect of the whole process. “Addictive” is how one of my training facilitators describes it. I think she’s right.

Hearing people try out bits of story, reminisce about the underlying experiences, respond to each other, make suggestions, etc. is where the ancient, relational human activity of storytelling meets modern media tools, particular genre affordances, and culturally specific narrative sensibilities.

Listening in on these conversations, even now, is nourishing to my soul. That’s especially true in this time when I, for one, am feeling starved for those experiences we might metaphorically call “sitting around the fire together,” whether it’s in the woods, or at the pub, or in a coffee shop, or on an meandering stroll to nowhere in particular (think “spazieren” if you know any German).

This is the episode where all the work of the series pays off. What we’ve learned about Tapestry, what I’ve learned about myself, the spiritual thread, the research thread, the media thread—it’s all there, and closing the loops is, I think, as satisfying as you might hope. (Whoops, I qualified that one!)

I hate to spoil any of it, but I dare you not to have a moment of empathy and connection and understanding of the Tapestry ethos when Zoe shows the group her keepsakes from former mentor Peg, even though we don’t get to see those keepsakes. You can hear in her voice what this group and what that particular relationship means to her. I don’t know any better way to “show” you what Tapestry is like, or to model the value and the technique of facilitating self-reflective media production, than to play back these recordings.

I hope you’ll come away feeling nourished too. And I hope in the process I’ll convince you that digital storytelling and related media authoring practices are worth your time and effort, in whatever spaces you seek to make meaning in your life or the lives of the people whose learning and formation you accompany.

Lauren & Veronica recording

Introducing Faith-Adjacent

(Inbox-friendly link to episode.)

This is the pilot episode of Faith-Adjacent, a podcast about my ongoing dissertation research at Teachers College, Columbia University. I prepared it both to launch the eventual series itself and to share at the Ethnography and Education Forum February 22-23 at the University of Pennsylvania. For more context, read the brief narrative at the end of these show notes.

You can see slides from a more traditional academic presentation of this research at prayr.cc/space-heard. The photo Lauren talks about is in slide 5.

Learn more about digital storytelling at storycenter.org. Learn more about me and subscribe to my Learning, Faith, & Media Newsletter at kyleoliver.net.

References and further reading:

Ackermann E. K. (2007) Experiences of artifacts: People’s appropriations / objects’ “affordances”. In: Glasersfeld E. (Ed.) Key works in radical constructivism* (pp. 249–259). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Hess, M. E. (2012). Mirror neurons, the development of empathy, and digital story telling. Religious Education, 107, 401–414.

Lambert, J. (2012). Digital storytelling: Capturing lives, creating community*. New York, NY: Routledge.

* Full disclosure: Affiliate link.


As many of you know, I’m in the process of framing and proposing my dissertation.

I study with educational ethnographer Lalitha Vasudevan and am living into an ethnography practice based on a framework she and her colleagues call “research pedagogies.” Basically the idea is to take a participatory and multimodal stance to “embedded” research.

I hang out. I ask a lot of questions. I teach and facilitate media production. I care (always “about” and sometimes “for”) the people I meet.

Last summer I conducted a pilot study in a faith-adjacent setting, a sort of test drive for the approach I’m hoping to take. I wrote a really long paper about it and presented data and analysis at the Religious Education Association annual conference.

But even good academic papers can be excruciating, and they often require jumping through theoretical hoops that kind of systematically deter practitioners from reading them.

Moreover, my research is all about making meaning in the midst of making media. I spent the better part of a week transcribing hours of audio recordings from the pilot, plus I have the media my participants created themselves.

This seemed like a good opportunity to try something different.

So a couple weeks back, I presented at the Ethnography in Education Forum in Philadelphia a short pilot episode of a podcast I’m calling Faith-Adjacent. It’s a show about media, meaning, and what we used to call religious education (and currently call faith formation, and will probably be calling something else as church and society continue their inevitable march of change).

I’ve got at least some sense of where I’m heading with this, but I don’t want it to just be “the podcast version of my pilot study write-up” (and soon of the dissertation itself). So I welcome your feedback on this short piece of media, which is already pretty high on the list of things I’m proud to have made.

Please let me know what you think!